Introduction Classification Descriptions Launcher links Launch sites Statistics Ariane ASAP Athena Cosmos DELTA DNEPR MIR OSPSLV Pegasus PSLV Rockot Scout Shavit START STS Taurus Others
| |
Launchers
The high cost of getting into orbit is a major
obstacle for many small satellites. Smaller satellites are typically
launched as secondary passengers, hitching a ride on a larger launcher with a larger
payload. In recent years, as smaller satellites have become more popular and necessary, a
number of small satellite launchers are being developed in particular for the mini
(100-500kg) or medium sized satellite class (500-1000kg) spacecraft.
It has generally been the case that for microsatellites (10-100kg) it is more
economical to launch on the larger launchers, where the prime payload has procured the
launch, and employing the spare capacity does not incur significant additional costs. One
exciting development to watch over the next few years is in low cost launchers such as the
proposed Microcosm series, with projected costs into LEO an order of magnitude lower than
currently available. The graphs below demonstrates the launcher share for small satellites
for the period 1980-1999.
  
The links below give a brief description of the indicated launchers, and list which
small satellites have been launched and in some cases how. Future launches of interest are
also indicated.
General information
How small satellites are launched
Launcher classification
Launcher statistics
Launcher sites
Launcher links. (More general launcher links can be found on
the SSHP Resources page).
Launchers
Ariane family and the ASAP
Athena (LLV)
Cosmos
Delta
Dnepr
MIR
Pegasus
PSLV
Rockot (Eurockot)
Scout
Shavit
Start
STS, Hitchiker and GAS
Taurus
Other launchers
Launcher descriptions
|